Our Mission
Modern Post Weekly covers the tools, programs, and workflows people use to build income-generating skills — deck design, proposal writing, AI-assisted production work, and the freelance-style services built on top of them. We write for readers deciding whether a specific paid program is worth their time and money, so our reviews stay close to one question: does this actually produce a sellable skill, and does the price match what that skill is worth in the market?
How We Evaluate a Program
We run the curriculum
Our desk works through the lessons and produces a real practice deliverable, timing how long it takes to reach a client-presentable result.
We score against a rubric
Speed, learning curve, reusability, finished quality, and cost-to-value are scored the same way for every program we cover.
We check the market
Any rate or price context we publish is cross-checked against public freelance-platform listings before it runs.
We disclose the arrangement
When a feature is a paid partnership, it is labeled "Advertorial" at the top of the page — before the headline, not after it.
Editorial Independence & Disclosure
Some of the programs we cover compensate us for coverage. That never changes our scoring rubric or our verdict — it changes only whether a "Advertorial" tag appears at the top of the piece. We do not publish fabricated statistics, invented student outcomes, or guaranteed-income claims, and any market-rate figure we cite is marked with an asterisk and explained in our earnings disclaimer.
- Paid features are labeled before the reader reaches the headline.
- Market-rate and pricing figures are sourced from public listings, never invented.
- We do not claim a program guarantees income, clients, or contracts.
- Corrections are made promptly when a factual error is identified.
Questions or Corrections
If you spot something that needs a correction, or you want to know more about how a specific feature was evaluated, reach out through our contact page.